Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 screening in educational settings and children aged < 12 years (preprint)

Children have been disproportionately affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess a saliva-based algorithm for SARS-CoV-2 testing to be used in schools and childcare institutions under pandemic conditions. A weekly SARS-CoV-2 sentinel study in primary schools, kindergartens and childcare facilities was conducted over a 12-week-period. In a sub-study covering 7 weeks, 1895 paired oropharyngeal and saliva samples were processed for SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR testing in both asymptomatic children (n=1243) and staff (n=652). Forty-nine additional concurrent swab and saliva samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (patient cohort). The Salivette® system was used for saliva collection and assessed for feasibility and diagnostic performance. For children a mean of 1.18 ml saliva could be obtained. Based on results from both cohorts, the Salivette® testing algorithm demonstrated specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 - 100) and sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 81.4 - 99.1) with oropharyngeal swabs as reference. Agreement between sampling systems was 100% for moderate to high viral load situations (defined as Ct-values < 33 from oropharyngeal swabs). Comparative analysis of Ct-values derived from saliva vs. oropharyngeal swabs demonstrated a significant difference (mean 4.23; 95% CI 2.48–6.00). In conclusion, the Salivette® system proved to be an easy-to-use, safe and feasible saliva collection method and a more pleasant alternative to oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing in children aged 3 years and above.

Weekly SARS-CoV-2 sentinel in primary schools, kindergartens and nurseries, June to November 2020, Germany (preprint)

A 12-week sentinel programme monitored SARS-CoV-2 in primary schools, kindergartens and nurseries. Out of 3169 oropharyngeal swabs, only two tested positive on rRT-PCR while general incidence rates were surging. Thus, children attending respective institutions are not significantly contributing to the pandemic spread when appropriate infection control measures are in place.

Outbreak of COVID-19 in Germany Resulting from a Single Travel-Associated Primary Case (preprint)

Background: In December 2019, a newly identified coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) emerged in Wuhan, China, causing respiratory disease (COVID-19) presenting with fever, cough and frequently pneumonia. WHO has set the strategic objective to interrupt virus spread of SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. An outbreak in Bavaria, Germany, starting end of January 2020, gave the opportunity to study transmission events, incubation period, and attack rates.Methods: A case was defined as a person with SARS-CoV-2-infection confirmed by PCR. Case interviews were conducted to i) describe timing of onset and nature of symptoms, ii) identify and classify contacts. High-risk contacts were actively followed and monitored for symptoms, low-risk contacts were tested upon self-reporting of symptoms. Whole genome sequencing was used to confirm epidemiological links and clarify transmission events where contact histories were ambiguous; integration with epidemiological data enabled precise reconstruction of exposure events and incubation periods.Results: Case #0 was a Chinese person who visited Germany for professional reasons. Sixteen subsequent cases emerged in four transmission generations. Signature mutations occurred upon foundation of generation 2, as well as in one patient pertaining to generation 4. Median incubation period and serial interval were 4.0 days, respectively. Transmissions occurred frequently pre-symptomatic, at day of symptom onset and during prodromal phase (symptoms other than fever and cough for ≥1 day at beginning of illness phase). Attack rates were 75% among members of a household cluster in common isolation, 10% among household contacts only together until isolation of case, and 5% among non-household high-risk contacts.Conclusions: While our cases present with predominately mild, non-specific symptoms, infectiousness before or on the day of symptom onset or during prodromal phase is substantial. Additionally, the incubation period is often very short, false-negative tests may occur. Although the outbreak was apparently controlled, successful long-term and global containment of COVID-19 may be difficult to achieve.Funding Statement: Contributions by C. D. and V. M. C. were funded by the German Ministry of Health (Konsiliarlabor für Coronaviren), as well as the German Center for Infection Research. S.B., T.W., K.P., N.M, and T.S.B. are fellows of the ECDC Fellowship Programme, supported financially by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).Declaration of Interests: The authors declared no competing interest. Ethics Approval Statement: The outbreak investigation was conducted as part of the authoritative, official tasks of the county health departments as well as the state health department of the Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, supported by the Robert Koch Institute. As conducted in response to a public health emergency, this study was exempt from institutional review board approval.